International Journal of Experimental Dental Science

Register      Login

VOLUME 1 , ISSUE 2 ( July-December, 2012 ) > List of Articles


Does bonding to Dentin reduce Gap formation in Composite Restorations?

Daniela Araújo Veloso Popoff, Murilo de Sousa Menezes, Andressa dos Santos Gomes, André Luis Faria-e-Silva, Paulo Vinícius Soares, Paulo César Santos-Filho, Luís Roberto Marcondes Martins

Citation Information : Popoff DA, Menezes MD, Gomes AD, Faria-e-Silva AL, Soares PV, Santos-Filho PC, Martins LR. Does bonding to Dentin reduce Gap formation in Composite Restorations?. Int J Experiment Dent Sci 2012; 1 (2):67-70.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10029-1017

Published Online: 01-12-2014

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2012; The Author(s).


How to cite this article

Popoff DAV, Menezes MS, Gomes AS, Faria-e-Silva AL, Soares PV, Santos-Filho PC, Martins LRM. Does bonding to Dentin reduce Gap formation in Composite Restorations? Int J Experiment Dent Sci 2012;1(2):67-70.

PDF Share
  1. Systematic reviews: I. The correlation between laboratory tests on marginal quality and bond strength. II. The correlation between marginal quality and clinical outcome. J Adhes Dent 2007;9:77-106.
  2. Repair of dimethacrylate-based composite restorations by a silorane-based composite: A one-year randomized clinical trial. Oper Dent 2012 Sep-Oct;37(5):E1-E10.
  3. Does a low-shrinking composite induce less stress at the adhesive interface? Dent Mater 2010;26:215-22.
  4. Factors influencing marginal cavity adaptation of nanofiller containing resin composite restorations. Dent Mater 2010;26:1166-75.
  5. 3D-FEA of stress levels and distributions for different bases under a Class I composite restoration. Am J Dent 2011;24:3-7.
  6. Transient thermal and stress analysis of maxillary second premolar tooth using an exact three-dimensional model. Indian J Dent Res 2010;2:158-64.
  7. Longterm degradation of enamel and dentin bonds: Six-year results in vitro vs in vivo. Dent Mater 2010 Nov;26(11):1113-18.
  8. A review of adhesion science. Dent Mater 2010;26:11-16.
  9. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: Methods and results. J Dent Res 2005;84:118-32.
  10. Dental adhesion review: Aging and stability of the bonded interface. Dent Mater 2008;24:90-101.
  11. Class II restorations with margins below the CEJ. J Esthet Restor Dent 2009;21:193-201.
  12. Effect of surface roughness of cavity preparations on the microleakage of class V resin composite restorations. Oper Dent 2003;28:779-85.
  13. 5-year clinical performance of resin composite versus resin modified glass ionomer restorative system in non-carious cervical lesions. Oper Dent 2006;31: 403-08.
  14. Two-year clinical performance of resinous restorative system in non-carious cervical lesions. Braz Dent J 2010;21:229-34.
  15. Effect of phosphoric acid etching of enamel margins on the microleakage of a simplified all-in-one and a self-etch adhesive system. Oper Dent 2009;34:531-36.
  16. Comparison of microtensile bond strength to enamel and dentin of human, bovine, and porcine teeth. J Adhes Dent 2004;6: 117-21.
  17. Recent advances in the theory and mechanism of adhesive resin bonding to dentin: A critical review. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2009;88:558-78.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.