International Journal of Experimental Dental Science

Register      Login

VOLUME 1 , ISSUE 2 ( July-December, 2012 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

In vitro Comparison between Two Different Implant Titanium Surfaces in Osseointegration Process

Andrea Ballini, Apollonia Desiate, Stefania Cantore

Citation Information : Ballini A, Desiate A, Cantore S. In vitro Comparison between Two Different Implant Titanium Surfaces in Osseointegration Process. Int J Experiment Dent Sci 2012; 1 (2):84-88.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10029-1021

Published Online: 01-12-2012

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2012; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

How to cite this article

Ballini A, Desiate A, Cantore S. In vitro Comparison between Two Different Implant Titanium Surfaces in Osseointegration Process. Int J Experiment Dent Sci 2012; 1(2):84-88.


PDF Share
  1. Osseointegrated oral implants.A Swedish multicenter study of 8139 consecutively inserted Nobelpharma implants. J Periodontol 1988 May;59(5):287-96.
  2. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of partially edentulous jaws: A prospective 5-years multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9(6):627-35.
  3. Clinical and statistical analyses of human clinical trials with single crystal aluminum oxide endosteal dental implants: Five-year results. J Prosthet Dent 1988;60:226-34.
  4. Clinical report on the success of 47 consecutive placed corevent implants followed from 3 months to 4 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:53-60.
  5. A 3-year clinical study of Astra dental implants in the treatment of edentulous mandibles. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:321-29.
  6. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand 1981;52:155-70.
  7. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature. J Biomed Mater Res 1991;25:889-902.
  8. Effect of low-level laser irradiation on osteoblast proliferation and bone formation. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents 2011 Oct-Dec;25(4):603-14.
  9. Demonstration of phosphates in calcium deposits: A modification of von Kossa's reaction. Histochemistry 1978;56:177-85.
  10. Biocompatibility: Performance in the surgical reconstruction of man. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 1990;15(1):20-33.
  11. Bone response to unloaded and loaded titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: A histometric study in the canine mandible. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;40:1-11.
  12. A histomorphometric evaluation of screw-shaped implants each prepared with two surface roughnesses. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9:11-19.
  13. Anchorage of TiO2-blasted, HA-coated, and machined implants: An experimental study with rabbits. J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29:1223-31.
  14. Histomorphometric and removal torque study of screw-shaped titanium implants with three different surface topographies. Clin Oral Implant Res 1996;6:24-30.
  15. A prospective multicenter clinical trial comparing onestage plasma-sprayed solid-screw fixtures. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000;2:159-65.
  16. The impact of oral implants— past and future, 1966–2042. J Can Dent Assoc 2005;71:327.
  17. The relation between surface roughness and interfacial shear strength for bone-anchored implants. A mathematical model. J Biomech 1999;32:829-36.
  18. A prospective multicenter clinical study of the Osseotite implant: Four-year interim report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:193-200.
  19. Guided bone regeneration around titanium plasma-sprayed, acid-etched and hydroxyapatite-coated implants in the canine model. J Periodontol 2003;74:658-68.
  20. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: Different types of dental implants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;25:CD003815.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.