International Journal of Experimental Dental Science

Register      Login

VOLUME 2 , ISSUE 2 ( July-December, 2013 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Influence of Surface Inclination on the Spreading Velocity of Simplified Adhesive Systems

Flavia Bittencourt Pazinatto, Fabrício Luscino Alves de Castro, Maria Teresa Atta

Citation Information : Pazinatto FB, Castro FL, Atta MT. Influence of Surface Inclination on the Spreading Velocity of Simplified Adhesive Systems. Int J Experiment Dent Sci 2013; 2 (2):92-97.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10029-1048

Published Online: 01-12-2013

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2013; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim

Adhesion can be influenced by adhesives spreading. Both slow and fast spreading can be deleterious as they can respectively lead adhesive to partially cover the demineralized substrate or to accumulate on line angles of cavity preparations. Since brands of dentin bonding systems present distinct compositions and thus different behaviors its important to know how fast they spread over dental substrates. The purpose is to determine the influence of surface inclinations on the spreading velocity of simplified adhesive systems.

Materials and methods

Spreading velocities of adhesive systems (Adper Single Bond, Adper Single Bond Plus, Adper Prompt, Prime and Bond 2.1, Prime and Bond NT, One-Up Bond F) were measured on glass slide surfaces inclined at 45° and 90°. The spreading of each drop was observed at a 30 seconds interval. Data was recorded and the values obtained at 30 seconds were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Student-Newman-Keuls (SNK) tests (α = 0.05).

Results

The type of adhesive system and the angle of inclination influenced spreading velocity (p < 0.05). Adper Single Bond Plus and One-Up Bond F exhibited the lowest spreading velocities of all materials tested (p < 0.01). Adhesives spreading were similar on surfaces inclined 45° and 90°, except for Adper Single Bond Plus which spread faster and Prime and Bond NT that spread slower on 90° angled surfaces (p < 0.01).

Conclusion

The materials tested showed complex spreading patterns since the spreading velocities changed only when some specific material/inclination combinations where tested.

How to cite this article

Pazinatto FB, de Castro FLA, Saini R, Atta MT. Influence of Surface Inclination on the Spreading Velocity of Simplified Adhesive Systems. Int J Experiment Dent Sci 2013;2(2):92-97.


PDF Share
  1. Surface topography: its influence on wetting and adhesion in a dental adhesive system. J Dent Res 1972;51:780-788.
  2. The dependence of the apparent contact angles on gravity. J Colloid Interface Sci 1999;210:152-156.
  3. Effect of dentin primer application on regional bond strength to cervical wedge-shaped cavity walls. Oper Dent 1999;24:81-88.
  4. The chemistry of adhesive agents. Oper Dent 1992;5:32-43.
  5. Effect of two etching times on the sealing ability of Clearfil Liner Bond 2 in class V restorations. Am J Dent 1997;10:66-70.
  6. Relationship between adhesive thickness and microtensile bond strength. Oper Dent 2001;26:97-104.
  7. Effect of adhesive layer properties on stress distribution in composite restorations–a 3D finite element analysis. Dent Mater 2002;18:295-303.
  8. A morphological and tensile bond strength evaluation of an unfilled adhesive with low-viscosity composites and a filled adhesive in one and two coats. J Dent 2001;29:435-441.
  9. Wetting characteristic of ceramic to water and adhesive resin. J Prosthetic Dent 2002;88:616-621.
  10. Principles of adhesion. Oper Dent 1992;5:1-9.
  11. Dentin wetting by four adhesive systems. Dent Mater 2001;17:526-532.
  12. Materials science for dentistry. 9th ed. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing Limited 2009;4:82-107.
  13. Effect of primer solvent, primer agitation and dentin dryness on shear bond strength to dentin. Am Dent 1998;11:225-228.
  14. Rheology of urethane dimethacrylate and diluent formulations. Dent Mater 1999;15:257-261.
  15. Effect of silane primers and unfilled resin bonding agents on repair bond of a prosthodontic microfilled composite. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29: 644-648.
  16. Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Dent Mater 2007;28:3757-3785.
  17. Polymerization shrinkage and elasticity of flowable composites and filled adhesives. Dent Mater 1999;15:128-137.
  18. The effects of dentin permeability on restorative dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 2002;46:211-245.
  19. Chemical aspects of selfetching enamel-dentin adhesives: a systematic review. Dent Mater 2005;21:895-910.
  20. The effect of organic solvents on one-bottle-adhesives’ bond strength to enamel and dentin. Oper Dent 2003;28: 700-706.
  21. Sliding of liquid drops down an inclined solid surface. J Colloid Interface Sci 2002;247: 372-380.
  22. Physics for scientists and engineers with modern physics. 9th ed. Boston: Cengage Learning 2014;13: 388-416.
  23. Water sorption of several bonding resins. Am J Dent 1999;12:295-298.
  24. Correlation of dentin bond durability with water absorption of bonding layer. Dent Mater J 1999;18:11-18.
  25. Effects of multiple adhesive coatings on dentin bonding. Oper Dent 2004;29:416-423.
  26. The effect of double adhesive application on the shear bond strength to dentin of compomers using three one-bottle adhesive systems. Oper Dent 2001;26:313-317.
  27. Effects of multiple coatings of two all-in-one adhesives on dentin bonding. J Adhes Dent 2005;2:133-141.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.