International Journal of Experimental Dental Science

Register      Login

VOLUME 3 , ISSUE 1 ( January-June, 2014 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Comparing Shear Bond Strength of Two Step vs One Step B onding Agents on Ground Enamel and Dentin: An in vitro Study

Shubhangi Mani, Darshan Deepak Shah, Narendra Manwar, Rushabh Malde

Citation Information : Mani S, Shah DD, Manwar N, Malde R. Comparing Shear Bond Strength of Two Step vs One Step B onding Agents on Ground Enamel and Dentin: An in vitro Study. Int J Experiment Dent Sci 2014; 3 (1):1-3.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10029-1058

Published Online: 00-06-2014

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2014; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim

To compare the shear bond strength of Tetric N Bond (Ivoclar Vivadent) and Single Bond Universal Adhesive (3M ESPE, MN, USA) on ground enamel and dentin.

Materials and methods

A total of 30 extracted human maxillary and mandibular molars and premolars were used for this study and divided into two groups which were treated with Tetric N Bond (Ivoclar Vivaden) t- and Single Bond Universal Adhesive (3M ESPE, MN, USA). The shear bond strength was tested on Universal testing machine (Instron).

Results

There was statistically significant difference in the shear bond strength among the two groups.

Conclusion

Based on the results (Tetric N Bond, Ivoclar Vivadent) had higher bond strength than Single Bond Universal Adhesive (3M ESPE, MN, USA) on ground enamel and dentin.

How to cite this article

Shah DD, Chandak M, Manwar N, Mani S, Mani A, Saini R, Malde R. Comparing Shear Bond Strength of Two Step vs One Step Bonding Agents on Ground Enamel and Dentin: An in vitro Study. Int J Experiment Dent Sci 2014;3(1):1-3.


PDF Share
  1. Enamel/Dentin adhesives: Pennsylvania academic of general dentistry-Dr. Swift article 2002. 1-14 p.
  2. The chemistry of bonding; pathways to perfection. 2002. 1-4 p.
  3. The evolution of dentin bonding from no-etch to total etch to self-etch, adhesive technology solutions, premier Issue; Kuraray 2002. p. 1-8.
  4. Shear bond strength of one 4th and two 7th generation bonding agents when used by operators with different bonding experience. J Adhesive Dent 2005;7(1);57-64.
  5. The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. J Biomed Marter Res 1982:16(3):265-273.
  6. Dental adhesives of the future. J Adhes Dent 2002;4(2):94-103.
  7. Monomer-solvent phase separation in one step self-etch adhesives. J Dent Res 2005;84(2):183-188.
  8. Continuing etching of an all in one adhesive in wet dentin tubules. J Dent Res 2005;84(4):350-354.
  9. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res 2004;84(2):118-132.
  10. In vivo degradation of resin dentin bonds produced by a self-etch and an etch-and-rinse adhesive. Eur J Oral Sci 2005;113(4):341-348.
  11. Effect of dentine conditioners on bonding efficacy of one bottle adhesives. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32(1):28-33.
  12. Seven years dentin bond strengths of a total and self-etch system. Eur J Oral Sci 2005;113(3):265-270.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.