International Journal of Experimental Dental Science

Register      Login

VOLUME 5 , ISSUE 2 ( July-December, 2016 ) > List of Articles


Scanning Electron Microscopic Evaluation of Root Canal Walls after shaping with Different Single-use Rotary Systems

Alberto Dagna, Riccardo Beltrami, Stefano Bianchi, Claudio Poggio, Giulia Gastaldo

Citation Information : Dagna A, Beltrami R, Bianchi S, Poggio C, Gastaldo G. Scanning Electron Microscopic Evaluation of Root Canal Walls after shaping with Different Single-use Rotary Systems. Int J Experiment Dent Sci 2016; 5 (2):93-98.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10029-1133

Published Online: 01-12-2010

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2016; The Author(s).


How to cite this article

Dagna A, Gastaldo G, Beltrami R, Bianchi S, Poggio C. Scanning Electron Microscopic Evaluation of Root Canal Walls after shaping with Different Single-use Rotary Systems. Int J Experiment Dent Sci 2016;5(2):93-98.

PDF Share
  1. ; Walton, RE. Endodontics: principles and practice. 4th ed. St. Louis (MO): Saunders Elsevier; 2009.
  2. The effectiveness of four clinical irrigation methods on the removal of root canal debris. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 1982 Sep;54(3):323-328.
  3. Efficacy of different irrigation methods and concentrations of root canal irrigation solutions on bacteria in the root canal. Endod Dent Traumatol 1992 Feb;8(1):6-11.
  4. Antimicrobial effect of six endodontic sealers: an in vitro evaluation. Endod Dent Traumatol 1999 Feb;15(1):42-45.
  5. Antimicrobial activity of endodontic sealers on Enterococcus faecalis. J Endod 2003 Apr;29(4):257-258.
  6. An in vitro evaluation of the particle flotation capability of various irrigating solutions. J Calif Dent Assoc 1975 Mar;3(3):60-63.
  7. An evaluation of the action of different root canal irrigants on facultative aerobicanaerobic, obligate anaerobic, and microaerophilic bacteria. J Endod 1999 May;25(5):351-353.
  8. A comparison of 2.0% chlorhexidine gluconate and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite as antimicrobial endodontic irrigants. J Endod 1994 Jun;20(6):276-278.
  9. Antibacterial effects of endodontic irrigants on black-pigmented Gramnegative anaerobes and facultative bacteria. J Endod 1998 Jun;24(6):414-416.
  10. Microbiologic analysis of teeth with failed endodontic treatment and the outcome of conservative retreatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 1998 Jan;85(1):86-93.
  11. In vitro antimicrobial efficacy of MTAD and sodium hypochlorite. J Endod 2003 Jul;29(7):450-452.
  12. Influence of the NiTi rotary system on the debridement quality of the root canal space. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2009 Oct;108(4):e71-e76.
  13. Comparison of root canal preparation with two rotary NiTi instruments: ProFile .04 and GT Rotary. Int Endod J 2007 Jul;40(7):553-562.
  14. A comparative evaluation of smear layer removal with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid in different states: a SEM study. Indian J Dent Res 2011 Jan-Feb;22(1):10-15.
  15. Antimicrobial activity of varying concentrations of sodium hypochlorite on the endodontic microorganisms Actinomyces israelii, A. naeslundii, Candida albicans and Enterococcus faecalis. Int Endod J 2004 Jul;37(7):438-446.
  16. In vitro evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of endodontic irrigants. Int J Artif Organs 2011 Sep;34(9):914-919.
  17. Reduction of intracanal bacteria using nickel–titanium rotary instrumentation and various medications. J Endod 2000 Dec;26(12):751-755.
  18. SEM evaluation of canal wall dentin following use of Mtwo and Protaper NiTi rotary instruments. Int Endod J 2004 Dec;37(12):832-839.
  19. The effectiveness of different acid irrigating solutions in root canal cleaning after hand and rotary instrumentation. J Endod 2006 Oct;32(10):993-997.
  20. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of debris and smear layer remaining following use of ProTaper and Hero Shaper instruments in combination with NaOCl and EDTA irrigation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2008 Oct;106(4):63-71.
  21. Efficacy of bacterial removal from instrumented root canals in vitro related to instrumentation technique and size. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2002 Sep;94(3):366-371.
  22. Comparison of two rotary systems in root canal preparation regarding disinfection. J Endod 2010 Jul;36(7):1238-1240.
  23. Antibacterial efficacy of conventional and singleuse NiTi endodontic instruments: an in vitro microbiological evaluation. Int J Artif Organs 2012 Oct;35(10):826-831.
  24. Long-term evaluation of the influence of smear layer removal on the sealing ability of different sealers. J Endod 1999 Feb;25(2):123-125.
  25. An apical leakage study in the presence and absence of the smear layer. Int Endod J 1994 Mar;27(2):87-93.
  26. An in vitro assessment of the physical properties of novel Hyflex nickel-titanium rotary instruments. Int Endod J 2012 Nov;45(11):1027-1034.
  27. Single file NiTi rotary systems. Int J Med and Dent Sci 2015;4 (Suppl 1):701-707.
  28. Root canal cleanliness after preparation with different endodontic handpieces and hand instruments: a comparative SEM investigation. J Endod 1997 May;23(5):301-306.
  29. Evolution of Nickel-Titanium instruments: from past to future. Endod Topics 2013 Sep;29(1):3-17.
  30. Fifth-generation technology in endodontic: the shaping movement. Roots 2014;1:22-28.
  31. Suboptimal debridement quality produced by the single-file F2 ProTaper technique in oval-shaped canals. J Endod 2010 Nov;36(11):1897-1900.
  32. Reciprocating root canal technique induces greater debris accumulation than a continuous rotary technique as assessed by three-dimensional micro-computed tomography. J Endod 2013 Aug;39(8):1067-1070.
  33. Quantitative evaluation of apically extruded debris with different single-file systems: Reciproc, F360 and OneShape versus Mtwo. Int Endod J 2014 May;47(5):405-409.
  34. Ozone therapy in dentistry: a strategic review. J Nat Sc Biol Med 2011; 2:151-3.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.