International Journal of Experimental Dental Science

Register      Login

VOLUME 7 , ISSUE 2 ( July-December, 2018 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Protective Effects of Base Cements against Intrapulpal Temperature Rise during Curing of Composite Resins: An In Vitro Study by Pulpal Blood Microcirculation Model

Ihsan F Ertugrul, Basak Yazkan, Ceylan Ç Ertugrul

Keywords : Base cements, Intrapulpal temperature increase, In vitro study, Light curing of composite resins, Pulp microcirculation, Thermal insulating

Citation Information : Ertugrul IF, Yazkan B, Ertugrul CÇ. Protective Effects of Base Cements against Intrapulpal Temperature Rise during Curing of Composite Resins: An In Vitro Study by Pulpal Blood Microcirculation Model. Int J Experiment Dent Sci 2018; 7 (2):85-90.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10029-1180

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-12-2018

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2018; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim: Measuring the temperature increases in the pulp chamber during polymerization of resin composites when various base cements were applied on the cavity floor, by using a pulp microcirculation simulation model with physiologic temperature. Materials and methods: Study performed with four groups of 10 experiments each. Class V cavity with 3 x 4 x 2 mm3 size was prepared on human mandibular premolar tooth with 1 mm pulpal wall thickness. Pulpal microcirculation and temperature regulation of the tooth within physiological limits performed with an experimental mechanism. In groups 1–3, polycarboxylate cement (PC), conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC) and resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) were applied as base cements, respectively. No base material was used in group 4. Restorations were completed with the same composite resin and cured for equal time (20 s) using Demi™ Plus Dental- Curing-LED-Light (1200 mW/cm2). Temperature increases (Δt) in the pulp during curing of resins were recorded and statistically analyzed with Mann–Whitney U and Kruskal–Wallis test. Results: The highest Δt values were measured in group 4 (5.76 ± 0.25), group 3 (5.44 ± 0.19), group 1 (4.95 ± 0.32) and group 2 (4.86 ± 0.4), respectively. There were statistically significant differences between group 2 and group 4, and groups 1 and group 4 in Δt values (p = 0.0001). Conclusion: Applying base cements is significantly effective in reducing the temperature increases generated in the pulp tissue. PC and GIC have been found to be more effective than RMGIC in preventing the pulp tissue against thermal stimuli. Clinical significance: This research is important to provide to clinicians critical information about the temperature increases which may occur in the pulp during curing of composite resins and precautions to be taken.


PDF Share
  1. Langeland K. Effect of various procedures on the human dental pulp. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1961;14(2):210-233.
  2. Zach L, Cohen G. Pulp response to externally applied heat. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1965;19(4):515-530.
  3. McCabe JF. Cure performance of light-activated composites by differential thermal analysis. Dent Mater 1985;1(6): 231-234.
  4. Lloyd CH, Joshi A, McGlynn E. Temperature rises produced by light sources and composites during curing. Dent Mater 1986;2(4):170-174.
  5. Masutani S, Setcos JC, Schnell RJ, et al. Temperature rise during polymerization of visible light activated resins. Dent Mater 1988;4(4):174-178.
  6. Kuo WC, Chang YH, Lin CL, et al. Effects of different ceramic and dentin thicknesses on the temperature rise during photocuring. J Dent Sci 2011;6(4):210-215.
  7. Murray PE, Smith AJ, Windsor LJ, et al. Remaining dentine thickness and human pulp responses. Int Endod J 2003;36(1): 33-43.
  8. Wataha JC, Lockwood PE, Lewis JB, et al. Biological effects of blue light from dental curing units. Dent Mater 2004;20(2):150- 157.
  9. Uhl A, Mills RW, Jandt KD. Polymerization and light-induced heat of dental composites cured with LED and halogen technology. Biomaterials 2003;24(10):1809-1820.
  10. Brown W, Dewey W, Jacobs H. Thermal properties of teeth. J Dent Res 1970;49:752-755.
  11. Kwon SJ, Park YJ, Jun SH, et al. Thermal irritation of teeth during dental treatment procedures. Restor Dent Endod 2013;38(3):105-112.
  12. Kodonas K, Gogos C, Tziafa C. Effect of simulated pulpal microcirculation on intrachamber temperature changes following application of various curing units on tooth surface. J Dent 2009;37(6):485-490.
  13. Kodonas K, Gogos C, Tziafas D. Effect of simulated pulpal microcirculation on intrapulpal temperature changes following application of heat on tooth surfaces. Int Endod J 2009;42(3):247-252.
  14. Pohto M, Scheinin A. Microscopic observations on living dental pulp. Acta Odontol Scand 1958;16(3):303-327.
  15. Moon HJ, Lee YK, Lim BS, et al. Effects of various light curing methods on the leachability of uncured substances and hardness of a composite resin. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31(3):258-264.
  16. Raab WH. Temperature related changes in pulpal microcirculation. Proc Finn Dent Soc 1992;88(Suppl 1):469-479.
  17. Michalakis K, Pissiotis A, Hirayama H, et al. Comparison of temperature increase in the pulp chamber during the polymerization of materials used for the direct fabrication of provisional restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2006;96(6): 418-423.
  18. Yazici AR, Müftü A, Kugel G, et al. Comparison of temperature changes in the pulp chamber induced by various light curing units, in vitro. Oper Dent 2006;31(2):261-265.
  19. Kim S. Microcirculation of the dental pulp in health and disease. Journal of Endodontics 1985;11(11):465-471.
  20. Hannig M, Bott B. In-vitro pulp chamber temperature rise during composite resin polymerization with various lightcuring sources. Dent Mater 1999;15(4):275-281.
  21. Karatas O, Turel V, Bayindir YZ. Temperature rise during polymerization of different cavity liners and composite resins. J Conserv Dent 2015;18(6):431-435.
  22. Yaþa E, Atalayýn C, Karaçolak G, et al. Intrapulpal temperature changes during curing of different bulk-fill restorative materials. Dent Mater J 2017;36(5):566-572.
  23. Smith DC. A new dental cement. Br Dent J 1968;124(9): 381-384.
  24. Diaz-Arnold AM, Vargas MA, Haselton DR. Current status of luting agents for fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81(2):135-141.
  25. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Crispin BJ. Dental luting agents: A review of the current literature. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80(3):280- 301.
  26. Xie D, Brantley W, Culbertson B, et al. Mechanical properties and microstructures of glass-ionomer cements. Dent Mater 2000;16(2):129-138.
  27. Glasspoole EA, Erickson RL, Davidson CL. Effect of surface treatments on the bond strength of glass ionomers to enamel. Dent Mater 2002;18(6):454-462.
  28. Wilson AD. Developments in glass-ionomer cements. Int J Prosthodont 1989;2(5):438-446.
  29. Wilson AD. Resin-modified glass-ionomer cements. Int J Prosthodont 1990;3(5):425-429.
  30. Souza PP, Aranha AM, Hebling J, et al. In vitro cytotoxicity and in vivo biocompatibility of contemporary resin-modified glass-ionomer cements. Dent Mater 2006;22(9):838-844.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.