Stress in the Mandible with Splinted Dental Implants caused by Limited Flexure on Mouth Opening: An in vitro Study
Balázs Erdohelyi, Péter István Szabó, Endre Varga
Citation Information :
Erdohelyi B, Szabó PI, Varga E. Stress in the Mandible with Splinted Dental Implants caused by Limited Flexure on Mouth Opening: An in vitro Study. Int J Experiment Dent Sci 2012; 1 (1):8-13.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the stress developed in the bar connecting implants and in the mandible as a result of the elastic deformation of the mandible during mouth opening when using a finite element method (FEM).
Materials and methods
A three-dimensional model of an edentulous mandible was generated based on the computer tomography (CT) data of a patient. Two cylindrical implants (diameter 4.3 mm, length 13 mm) were inserted in the area of the mandibular canine, premolar and molar in the mandibular model. Implants were connected with a rigid bar (width 2 mm, height 3 mm), and mouth opening was simulated on the threedimensional (3D) model. The location and magnitude of maximum von Misess stress that occurred in the mandible and in the bar were estimated.
Results
The highest stress level in the mandible (4.5 GPa) and in the splint (32 GPa) was measured in the longest fixed partial denture with the implants in the mandibular left canine and left second molar position. The maximum stress in the bone was measured distal to the splinted implants.
Conclusion
Since, great distance between splinted implants caused high stress during mouth opening, due to mandibular deformation, the use of a short span fixed partial denture supported by implants in the molar region of the edentulous mandible is probably more advantageous.
How to cite this article
Radnai M, Erdohelyi B, Szabó PI, Varga E. Stress in the Mandible with Splinted Dental Implants caused by Limited Flexure on Mouth Opening: An in vitro Study. Int J Exper Dent Sci, 2012;1(1):8-13.
Evaluation of mandibular arch width change. J Prosthet Dent 1981;46:385-92.
Mandibular deformation in subjects with osseointegrated implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991; 6: 319-28.
The rotational aspect of mandibular flexure. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 64: 483-85.
The influence of mandibular deformation, implant numbers, and loading position on detected forces in abutments supporting fixed implant superstructures. J Prosth Dent 1998; 80: 169-74.
Mandibular flexure and stress build-up in mandibular full-arch fixed prostheses supported by osseointegrated implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003; 14:103-14.
A positive correlation between occlusal trauma and peri-implant bone loss: Literature support. Implant Dent 2005; 14: 108-16.
Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: A review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:585-98.
Surgical planning tool with biomechanical simulation. In Proceedings of the Int J Comput Assist Radiol and Surg 2007;2(Suppl.):S262-63.
Fuzzy-connected 3D image segmentation at interactive speeds. Graph Models 2002; 64: 259-81.
Marching cubes: A high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm. ACM SIGGRAPH Comput Graph 1987; 21: 163-69.
Three-dimensional finite element analysis of implant stability in the atrophic posterior maxilla: A mathematical study of the sinus floor augmentation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002; 13: 657-65.
Effects of different inter-implant distances on the stress distribution around endosseous implants in posterior mandible: A 3D finite element analysis. Med Eng Phys 2006; 28: 199-213.